Can Anyone Really Tell the Difference Between Self-Published and Traditionally Published Books Now?

Self-published books look just like traditionally published ones. The difference is in the text inside.

Self-published books look just like traditionally published ones. The difference is in the text inside.

That’s not all, however. A couple of weeks ago, a writer pitched an article for WritersWeekly, calling publishers and editors bigoted if they reject an article or a book manuscript that has poor grammar and incorrect spelling…

They can’t sue me because it’s 100% true. That is a very common misconception among authors and the general public.

Imagine Christopher’s surprise when he tried to run an ad on Facebook for his books, and received the following response…

Our words are being strangled to death – by fear. Publishers fear causing offense. publishers fear backlash. So, their overall narrative and message essentially becomes woke and safe…
The publisher would probably LOVE to share the truth with the author, but he/she will not for very valid reasons.

Lately, we’ve seen more and more emails from people who feel it necessary to pour their derision and demands upon us for, of all things…

“The editors wrote back, specifically asking about my sexual orientation. I replied that journalism is only about accuracy, presenting facts in an understandable manner, and leaving readers with lasting memories about the presentation….”

“Shouldn’t anybody who’s willing to pay your fees be permitted to publish their book on your platform?” NOPE!!!

If you think most people support cancel culture, you are wrong.