Good advice, but I’d seriously consider a different approach. Treat this as mere harrassment and ignore it. Answer and you open a conversation that’ll always be troublesome and could get costly if you have to call in a lawyer to reply to his lawyer. Since he is in far-away Indonesia, any legal action he might take would be expensive and troublesome. Don’t make his task any easier. If he doesn’t have your phone number of mailing address, don’t give it to him.
A situation I found myself in was different, since it involved a lawyer, but I was once hassled by a lawyer who was acting way out of bounds and getting pushy. I never replied to him. He worked for a large international law firm, so I contacted that firm’s ethics person, presented the issue to him, and left it at that. I was never bothered again.
–Mike Perry, Inkling Books
How lucky we all are to have you in our corner.
Bridge of Sighs and Dreams
Nazi-occupied Rome sets the stage for Bridge of Sighs and Dreams, where the lives of two women collide in an arena of deception, greed, and sacrifice.
Book titles usually aren’t trademarked. Anyone can use your title for their book with impunity.
Unlike copyright which is automatic, trademark requires a lengthy and expensive process so trademarks for titles, character names, etc. usually happen when a book or book series is to be a movie like the Harry Potter titles and characters.
Many US state bar associations have a group of lawyers who volunteer their time pro bono to artists and writers. That’s a good place to start for questions.
– M Byerly
I should perhaps be the last to comment on marketing issues. I am dreadful at that. But I will note what seems to be the experience of others.
Marketing costs don’t scale well. Large publishers attempting to create a bestseller probably do get an ample return on their marketing investment, otherwise they wouldn’t do it. But smaller publishers and independent authors are likely to find, as Angela notes, that they don’t get much return on that investment. $100 spent for paid marketing might result in $10 more income. That makes no sense. There’s a threshold cost that advertising has to cross before it is effective. You probably can’t afford that threshold.
Instead, authors should look for ways to market their books where the impositions are on their time rather than their bank accounts. Look for ways to get the notice of potential readers that don’t cost money. That’ll depend on the kind of book you’re publishing, so the specifics will vary.
I will only mention one. If you’ve created a fiction series, distribute the first for free or very cheaply to stimulate interest. You might also give them subtitles that make potential buyers aware of the series and of which book to buy first. An example of that subtitle might be “Book Four in the Kitties are Cute Series.” That way, anyone who stumbles across any of your books, gets referred to the rest and particularly to book one.
Other suggestions include devoting a lot of time to the title and cover to make them appealing and coming up with the best possible keywords. Remember, most people aren’t going to find your book through ads in magazines. They’re going to find it when it pops up in search results.
One additional note. Today I got an email from Amazon Marketing Services (AMS), offering to help me “reach more readers.” Stubborn as I am, I’m not going to sign up because I see it as the entering wedge for Amazon becoming a retailer that makes it hard for a author to get visibility without paying them for publicity. That’s called an “entering wedge.” Once it starts, matters only get worse and worse.
Amazon itself hints at that when it says, “Register with Amazon Marketing Services, and take the first step toward increased sales and visibility for the eBooks in your catalog.” The flip side of that is, of course, that not registering with AMS means less visibility. Only so many books can fit on the first page of search results. To their great credit, Apple’s iBookstore has said it will never do that.
I see that search bias all the time in Amazon’s non-book arena. Amazon really does shape search results to maximize its income. Earlier this week, I needed to combine an order to get free shipping. That offered the opportunity to get a gadget I’ve long needed, a handy USB power monitor to check USB batteries, devices and cables. Amazon’s search wasn’t any help. It gave me long lists of poorly designed and dreadfully documented devices from China, all of whom were getting negative reviews. Amazon’s slice of their price must be a large one, I thought.
Some reviewers, however, mentioned PortaPow devices as the standard by which others should be judged, so I searched for that name and came up with the device that Amazon should have put at the top of their search list (91% of its reviews were five-star). Here it is:
That’s the one I ordered.
When it comes to books, you may find that slanted search results are a growing problem at Amazon. It wants those AMS books to sell and that means hiding non-AMS books. I think that’s stupid even from Amazon’s own perspective, since people who don’t find what they want typically don’t buy at all. But Amazon’s thinking doesn’t penetrate that deep. It’s pure “our customers are stupid” marketing. I certainly wasn’t going to buy those junky USB power monitors.
Whether you pay Amazon’s ‘blood money’ for greater book visibility is up to you. I have no doubt that it will get results. The real issue is whether authors should support such an Amazon practice given its long-term implications.
–Michael W. Perry, co-author of Lily’s Ride (YA novel)
HOW TO REMEMBER, WRITE AND PUBLISH YOUR LIFE STORY
Angela Hoy's popular online class is now available in book format!
Remember Your Past
and Publish It
in as little as 12 weeks!
Angela Hoy's book will get you started!
- Using Angela's MEMORY TRIGGERS, recall memories that have been dormant for years
- Record those memories in chronological order in your memory notebook
- Using the memory notebook as your outline, write your autobiography!
- Also works for biographies and memoirs!
Read more here: